Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
PURNENDU SINGH, J
Husainyana Khatoon @ Husain Ara Khatoon, Md. Aslam Khan @ Md. Aslam Sahid Khan – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar, Raunque Parween – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. disputes between spouses often escalate into legal conflict requiring judicial intervention. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. efforts for amicable settlement emphasize the judicial system's role in promoting reconciliation. (Para 5 , 17) |
| 3. family members should not face criminal charges without specific allegations. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. matters of family disputes should be treated with sensitivity to avoid undue prosecution. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. final decisions prioritize the welfare of minors and the importance of mediating disputes. (Para 12 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 20) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
Date : 12-12-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners have preferred application under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. for quashing of the order taking cognizance dated 18.06.2024 passed by learned A.C.J.M.-cum- Sub Judge-VIII, Rohtas at Sasaram in Mahila P.S. Case No. 47 of 2023, by which learned A.C.J.M.-cum-Sub Judge-VIII, Rohtas at Sasaram, has taken cognizance of offence under Sections 323 , 498 A/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section
3/4 of the D.P. Act .
3. The prosecution story in brief is that the informant was married to one Rashid Z
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
