Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
HONOURABLE MR. PURNENDU SINGH, J
Ramjee Prasad Kamkar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeal against conviction based on trial judgment. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. overview of the prosecution case and investigation. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. arguments on behalf of appellants regarding insufficient evidence. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. arguments on behalf of the state supporting the conviction. (Para 8) |
| 5. hearing and consideration of arguments. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 6. examination of witnesses in the trial. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 7. defendants' statements under section 313 of crpc. (Para 14 , 15) |
| 8. key sections of ipc relevant to the case. (Para 16 , 17) |
| 9. reliability of victim’s testimony and case precedents. (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 10. inconsistencies in victim’s testimony. (Para 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 11. medical evidence's impact on the reliability of the case. (Para 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 12. conclusion on prosecution's failure to establish charges. (Para 27 , 28) |
| 13. final ruling and disposal of appeals. (Para 29 , 30 , 31) |
C.A.V. JUDGMENT
Date : 19-12-2025
As learned counsel appearing for the appellants/accused has failed to appear when this matter was taken on Board for final hearing, therefore, this Court appointed Mr. Abhas Chandra, learned Advocate, present in Court, as an Amicus Curiae to assist the Court in
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
