Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
HONOURABLE MR. RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD, HONOURABLE MR. SOURENDRA PANDEY, JJ
Ajay Ram – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of the prosecution's case and injury report. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 27) |
| 2. trial court's findings on evidence and witness credibility. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 3. defendant's counsel arguments on evidence inconsistencies. (Para 16 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 4. prosecution’s rebuttal to defense arguments. (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 5. court’s analysis on witness reliability and medical evidence. (Para 26 , 40 , 41) |
| 6. supreme court's precedent on evidence and burden of proof. (Para 42 , 43 , 46 , 48 , 49) |
CAV JUDGMENT
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY)
Date : 08-12-2025
Heard Mr. Ashok Kumar Choudhary, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Baidya Nath Thakur and Mr. Anil Kumar Tiwary, learned Advocates for the appellant and Mr. Dilip Kumar Sinha, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. The present appeal arises out of the judgment of conviction dated 01.02.2023 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘impugned judgment’) and the order of sentence dated 14.02.2023 (in short referred to as the ‘impugned order’) passed by the learned District & Sessions Judge, West Champaran in connection with Sessions Trial No. 09 of 2020, arising out of Majhauliya P.S. Case No. 2
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
