SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 1981

PATNA HIGH COURT
RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD, SOURENDRA PANDEY, JJ
Banti Kumar Yadav @ Banti Yadav – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar Patna – Respondent
CRIMINAL APPEAL (DB) No.139 of 2024 | CRIMINAL APPEAL (DB) No. 280 of 2023



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Deepak Kumar Sinha, Ms. Sukanya Bharti, Mr. Manoj Kumar No. 1
For the Respondents: Mr. Abhimanyu Sharma, Mr. Ajay Mishra

The prosecution must prove allegations of sexual assault beyond reasonable doubt; inconsistencies in the victim's statements and lack of corroborative evidence resulted in acquittal.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code - Section 376(DA) - Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 - Sections 5(g), 5(L), and 6 - Conviction under sexual assault charges - Convicts received life imprisonment with fine after trial court reaffirmed prosecution's claims; however, inconsistencies in victim’s statements and lack of corroborative medical evidence led to reasonable doubt for acquittal on appeal. (Paras 3, 39)

(B) Criminal Procedure Code - Section 29 and 30 of POCSO Act - Presumption of innocence and burden of proof on prosecution - The accused cannot be convicted solely on the victim’s statement if doubts arise regarding specifics and evidence. (Paras 36, 40)

Facts of the case:
The appellants were convicted of sexually assaulting a minor based on the victim's fardbeyan and subsequent testimonies; however, contradictions in her statements led to doubts regarding the credibility of the prosecution's case.

Findings of Court:
The lack of consistent evidence, medical examination findings being inconclusive, and procedural discrepancies led the court to believe the case was not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

Issues: Whether the prosecution established the foundational facts required for a conviction under the POCSO Act, and the impact of inconsistencies in the victim's accounts.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that without corroborative evidence to support the victim's testimony, especially in serious allegations such as sexual assault, the presumption of innocence applies.

Result: Appeals allowed; the conviction and sentence set aside, and the appellants acquitted of all charges.

Table of Content
1. appellants convicted under ipc and pocso act. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. prosecution's case based on victim's fardbeyan. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
3. arguments presented by both parties. (Para 11 , 12 , 13)
4. contradictions in the victim's statements. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
5. medical evidence contradicts victim's claims. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 23)
6. need for reliable evidence in sexual assault cases. (Para 32 , 34)
7. acquittal of the appellants due to prosecution's failure. (Para 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43)

ORAL JUDGMENT

(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD)

Date : 09-12-2025

Heard learned counsel for the appellants, learned Amicus Curiae and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State in both the appeals. Despite service of notice upon the informant (Respondent No. 2) she has not entered appearance to oppose the appeal.

2. The present appeal arises out of the judgment of the conviction dated 25.11.2022 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘impugned judgment’) and the order of sentence dated 28.11.2022 (in short referred to as the ‘impugned order’) passed by the learned Exclusive Special Court (POCSO Act)-cum- 7th Additional District and Sessions Judge, Bhagalpur in connection with POCSO Case No. 141 of 2019 arising out of Kahalgaon P.S. Case No. 677 of 2019.

3. By the impugned judgment the appellants namely Banti Kumar Yadav @ Banti Yadav and Nanhku Mandal @ Nandlal Mandal @ Nandlal have been convicted for the offences under Sections 376 (DA) of the IPC and 5(g), 5(L)/6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (in short referred to as the ‘POCSO Act’) and have been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life which shall mean imprisonment for the remainders of natural life and to pay a fine of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each and in default of payment of fine to further undergo simple imprisonment for three months.

4. Prosecution Case:

The prosecution case is based on the fardbeyan of the victim (P.W. 2) recorded on 08.10.2019 at 16:45 hours at Kahalgaon police station. In her fardbeyan, she has stated that her mother has solemnized second marriage with Sanjay Mahaldar of village – Kodwar under Ghogha police station so she was living in the house of Sanjay Mahaldar with her mother. One month back her mother had gone to Amritsar on 05.10.2019 Sanjay Mahaldar had scolded and abused her so she came at Kisan Nagar and she was weeping, from where Bhabhi of Chandan Mandal took her at her house, where she was talking with her mother and her mother had assured that she was returning home. Further she alleged that on 07.10.2019 at the instance of Bhabhi of Chandan Mandal she had gone to visit a fair at Kolapur along with one Rajesh Kumar, friend of Chandan Mandal at 6:00 P.M., thereafter at about 8:00 P.M. Rajesh returned his house then she was returning to the house of Chandan at Kisan Nagar, she was coming behind another woman and as soon as she reached at Gopalpur Railway crossing, in the meantime, 2 – 3 boys began to tease her, so she went Railway crossing and stayed there in night. Further she has alleged that on 08.10.2019 at about 3:00 A.M. she started to go to the house of Chandan at Kisan Nagar but as soon as she reached near Santa School, in the meantime, Banti Yadav, R/o Kodwar and Nanhku @ Nandlal Mandal, R/o village Adarsh Nagar, Phulakiya both surrounded her and tried to act forcibly with bad intention and when she protested both began to assault her and dragged her in the garden near Santa High School and removed her cloths and committed rape twice one after another and threatened to kill her if she would file a case against them. She has further alleged that she remained in unconscious condition for a long time and when she regained conscious … she came at police station and gave information. She claimed that her mother was about to reach at Ghogha from Amritsar.

5. On the basis of the aforesaid written application, Kahalgaon P.S. Case No. 677 of 2019 dated 08.10.2019 was registere

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top