Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD, SOURENDRA PANDEY, JJ
Pramod Bhagat – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conviction based on trial court's findings (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. defense arguments challenging conviction (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 3. analysis of witness testimonies and evidence (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 21 , 22) |
| 4. medical evidence supports prosecution's case (Para 23 , 24) |
| 5. rationale for upholding the trial court's decision (Para 25 , 26) |
| 6. appeal dismissed; conclusion reached (Para 28 , 29) |
JUDGMENT
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD)
Date : 10-12-2025
Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State as also perused the learned trial court records.
2. This appeal has been preferred for setting aside the judgment of conviction dated 18.03.2023 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘impugned judgment’) and the order of sentence dated 21.03.2023 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘impugned order’) passed by learned 21st Additional District and Sessions Judge, Motihari, East Champaran (hereinafter referred to as the ‘learned trial court’) in Session Trial No.727 of 2019 arising out of Mehsi P.S. Case No.260 of 2019.
3. By the impugned judgment, the appellant has been convicted for the offence under Section 302 of the Indi
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
