Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
Sudhir Singh, ACJ, Rajesh Kumar Verma, J
The State of Bihar through its Principal Secretary, Department of Water Resources, Government of Bihar, Patna – Appellant
Versus
Prafulla Chandra Chaudhary – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. retirement benefits and increment claims. (Para 1 , 5) |
| 2. assessment of claim submissions by appellants. (Para 4 , 6) |
| 3. judicial precedents shaping increment claims at retirement. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. final decision on the merit of the appeals. (Para 10 , 11) |
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA)
Date : 01-12-2025 Heard Mr. Anjani Kumar (Senior Advocate) learned AAG-
4 assisted with Mr. Alok Kumar Rahi, learned AC to AAG-4 for the appellants.
I.A. No. 01 of 2024
2. This interlocutory application has been filed for condoning the delay of about eight months and sixteen days in filing the present memo of appeal.
3. For the reasons as mentioned in the aforesaid interlocutory application, particularly in paragraph nos. 3, 4 5 and 6, I.A. No. 01 of 2024 is allowed.
L.P.A. No. 1184 of 2024
4. The present intra court appeal has been filed by the State of Bihar against the order/judgement dated 02.02.2024 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 3460 of 2020 whereby the Hon’ble Court has been pleased to allow the writ petition of the petitioners/respondents directing the State authority to grant them increment notionally to the recon their last pay drawn and retirement benefits shall be re-fix
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
