Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
Ajit Kumar, J
Bijendra Yadav @ Vijendra Yadav – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. allegations of assault and land dispute context. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. grant of anticipatory bail based on observations. (Para 9 , 10) |
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR ORAL ORDER
2 03-12-2025 Heard the parties.
2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that during pendency of the instant anticipatory bail, petitioner no. 3, has been arrested, he therefore, seeks permission to withdraw the same.
3. Permission is accorded.
4. Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail with respect to petitioner no.3, namely, Roushan Yadav @
Raushan Kumar stands dismissed as withdrawn.
5. Now, the prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioners no.1 and 2 is being considered as they are apprehending their arrest in connection with Simri Bakhtiyarpur P.S. Case No. 240 of 2025 instituted under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 118(1), 109, 74, 303(2), 351(2), 3(5) of the BNS , lodged on 01.08.2025 by the informant, Ranjeet Yadav.
6. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged that on 29.07.2025 while he was going to cultivate his field by tractor and mistakenly one of the wheels of his tractor trespassed the field of Bijendra Yadav (petitioner no.1) wh
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
