Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
Ajit Kumar, J
Pankaj Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. allegations of assault without specific evidence against the petitioners. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. consideration of evidence led to the granting of bail. (Para 9) |
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR ORAL ORDER
2 03-12-2025 Heard the parties.
2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that during pendency of the present anticipatory bail, petitioner no. 4, has been arrested, he therefore, seeks permission to withdraw the application for anticipatory bail with respect to petitioner no.4.
3. Permission is accorded.
4. Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail with respect to petitioner no.4, namely, Udeshi Paswan stands dismissed as withdrawn.
5. Now, the prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioners no.1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 is being considered as they are apprehending their arrest in connection with Pakridayal P.S. Case No. 271 of 2025 instituted under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 329(3), 126(2), 115(2), 127(2), 118(2) 109, 125(a), 117(2), 324(4), 352, 351(2) of the BNS, lodged on 10.06.2025 by the informant.
6. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged that on 09.06.2025 at about 10.00 PM, petitioner no.1, Pankaj Kumar was th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
