SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 2288

PATNA HIGH COURT
Ajit Kumar, J
Monali kumari – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.84675 of 2025 | PS. Case No.-378 Year-2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Ms.Mili Kumari
For the Respondents: Mr.Ashok Kumar Singh, APP

Anticipatory bail granted due to general allegations and insufficient specificity against petitioners.

Headnote:This judgment pertains to a petition for anticipatory bail under Sections 80, 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023, regarding accusations against the petitioners for torturing the informant's daughter for dowry. The court finds the allegations general and insufficiently specific to deny bail, ultimately granting it to the petitioners under specified conditions. The absence of direct allegations against the petitioners was a pivotal factor in the court's assessment.

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR ORAL ORDER

2 24-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Daraundha (M.H. Nagar) P.S. Case No. 378 of 2025, dated 28.07.2025 registered for the offences under Sections 80 , 3(5) of the B.N.S. , 2023.

3. As per prosecution case, the accusation against the accused persons including the petitioners is of torturing the informant's daughter with an intention to abort the foetus in her womb for demand of dowry.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in the instant case. It is next submitted that the allegation made against the petitioners is general and omnibus in nature while the husband of the victim is already under judicial custody. The reason behind the death is strangulation. The petitioner no.1 is the unmarried sister-in-law of the victim against whom there is no specific allegation attributed and similarly, the allegation against the petitioner no.2 is also not very specific and both the petitioners were separate in mess and business from the co- accused Manish Pandey, who is said to be the husband of the victim.

5. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into account the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as also the allegation levelled against the petitioners being simple in nature, this Court is inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

7. Let the petitioners, above named, be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of four weeks from today on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-VI, Siwan in connection with Daraundha (M.H. Nagar) P.S. Case No. 378 of 2025, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 482(2)

of the BNSS, 2023.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top