Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
Ajit Kumar, J
Sunil Kumar @ Majak Yadav – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner argues innocent and unjustly implicated. (Para 4 , 9) |
| 2. threat and criminal intimidation regarding a land dispute. (Para 6 , 8) |
| 3. court's reasoning on granting bail despite prior criminal record. (Para 10) |
| 4. final order for anticipatory bail under specified conditions. (Para 11 , 12) |
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR ORAL ORDER
2 24-12-2025 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that during pendency of the instant application for anticipatory bail, petitioner no.1, Sunil Kumar @ Majak Yadav has been arrested by the police and, as such, this application has become infructuous in respect of petitioner no.1.
2. Accordingly, he seeks permission to withdraw the applicatiion for anticipatory bail in connection with petitioner no.1.
3. Permission is accorded.
4. The present application for anticipatory bail in respect of petitioner no.1, Sunil Kumar @ Majak Yadav stands dismissed as withdrawn having become infructuous.
5. Now, the prayer for anticipatory bail with respect to petitioner no.2, Vikash Kumar remains to be adjudicated.
6. The petitioner no.2 is apprehending his arrest in connection with Pali P.S. Case No. 111 of 2025, dated 11.09.2025 registe
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
