SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 2345

PATNA HIGH COURT
HONOURABLE , ACJ, HONOURABLE MR. ALOK KUMAR PANDEY, J
Dukhi Ram – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna – Respondent
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19855 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Petitioner/s: Mr. Nafisuzzoha
For the Respondent/s:Mr. Government Advocate (05), Mr. Anil Singh, Advocate, Mr. Ejaz Akhtar, Advocate

The Court requires inquiries into allegations of public fund embezzlement and underscores the need for accountability in government schemes.

Headnote:The Court examined the reliefs sought in a Public Interest Litigation concerning allegations of embezzlement of funds under a government scheme. The reliefs included inquiries and potential prosecutions against involved individuals. The Court directed the Block Development Officer to conduct an inquiry and report findings. Ultimately, it dismissed the application with directions for further action based on the inquiry's outcome.

Table of Content
1. court directs inquiry into public fund embezzlement (Para 1)
2. procedural directives for conducting an inquiry into allegations (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
3. court disposes of application pending investigative outcomes (Para 5 , 6)

CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE)

2 16-12-2025 The present writ application has been filed in the form of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) for the following reliefs:

“A. for issuance of an appropriate writ order or direction commanding the respondents to hold an inquiry for the committed embezzlement of funds in the name of government scheme.

B. For the issuance of an appropriate writ order or direction commanding the respondents to launch prosecution against the person involved in committing embezzlement of public money through corruption under the government scheme.

C. For issuance of an appropriate writ order or direction commanding the respondent authority to check against the accumulation of assets in excess of income by the Respondent No. 8.

D. For any other relief or relief for which petitioner is entitled in the opinion of this Hon’ble High Court.”

2. In view of the grievance raised by the petitioner, he is directed to make an application before the the Block Development Officer, Manigacchi, Darbhanga (respondent No.

6).

3. Upon submission of such application, respondent No. 6 shall conduct an appropriate enquiry after affording an opportunity of hearing to all concerned stakeholders and thereafter submit a report to the District Magistrate, Darbhanga (respondent No. 5).

4. In case any adverse report is submitted, the District Magistrate, Darbhanga shall take appropriate action, in accordance with law, against all persons found to be involved in the irregularities and illegalities.

5. With the aforesaid observations, the present writ application stands disposed of.

6. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.

(Sudhir Singh, ACJ)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top