PATNA HIGH COURT
Aalok Kumar Pandey, J
Mithun Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. arguments for and against the bail application. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 2. court's conclusion granting bail under specific conditions. (Para 6) |
2 23-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Rafiganj P.S. Case No. 341 of 2025, G.R. No. 2242 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 25(1-b)(a), 26 of the Arms Act and later on Section 35 of the Arms Act has been added.
3. As per prosecution case, on instruction of co-
accused Kundan Kumar, one country made three-nut rifle was recovered from the house of the petitioner.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in custody since 21.07.2025 and he bears no criminal antecedent. Charge sheet has been submitted in the case and there is no likelihood of tampering with the prosecution evidence. He further submits that the alleged place of recovery is joint house of the petitioner and he cannot be held liable for the alleged recovery. Petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence as alleged in the FIR and he has falsely been implicated in the present case.
5. The learned A.P.P. for the State opposes
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.