SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 2415

PATNA HIGH COURT
Aalok Kumar Sinha, J
Dilip Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar – Respondent
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19506 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners:Mr. Raju Giril, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Harsh Vardhan, Advocate, Mr. Harsh Raj, Advocate
For PPU:Mr. Rana Vikram Singh, Advocate, Mrs. Rasika, Advocate
For M.U.:Mr. Pankaj Kumar Singh, Advocate
For the State:Mr. Advocate General

The court emphasized procedural fairness and the necessity for adequate responses in education-related judicial reviews, ensuring compliance with due process.

Headnote:This judgment analyzes the procedural aspects involved in a Civil Writ application brought by the petitioners against multiple respondents pertaining to issues of education administration, requiring detailed counter affidavits from the universities involved. The court found merit in granting time for both universities to respond adequately to the petitioners' claims, emphasizing the necessity of procedural fairness in judicial reviews. The court specifically ordered the notice to certain respondents and set a timeline for the proceedings. The final order concluded with a directive for the next date of hearing.

2 03-12-2025 Heard learned senior counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel appearing for respondent-State, learned counsel for Patliputra University as well as learned counsel for Magadh University.

2. After hearing learned senior counsel, this Court is of the view that a detail counter affidavit is required to be filed by both the respondents, i.e., Patliputra University and Magadh University.

3. Four weeks’ time is granted to both the Universities to file their respective counter affidavits giving para-wise reply to the averments made in the writ application and a copy of the same shall be served in advance to the learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners who may file reply / rejoinder to the same within a further period of two weeks, if the petitioners so desires.

4. Issue notice to respondent Nos. 9 and 10 by both modes, i.e., Ordinary process as well as Speed Post with A.D. for which the necessary requisites must be filed by the petition- ers within two weeks, failing which this application shall stand rejected without further reference to Bench.

5. Put up this matter on 28.01.2026.

(Alok Kumar Sinha, J)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top