Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
Mr. Alok Kumar Sinha, J
Dr. Ramashish Prasad Sinha and Ors – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Bihar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. entitlement to selection scale dependent on promotion status. (Para 3) |
| 2. arguments presented regarding claim validity. (Para 4) |
| 3. court finds claim non-maintainable. (Para 5) |
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER
4 11-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the respondent-State.
2. The petitioners in the present writ application have prayed for grant of following relief :-
“That this writ petition is being filed by petitioners above named seeking writ of mandamus, or through any other direction to command respondents authorities either through making correction in the letter dated 17.07.2017 to the extent of provide pay protection etc. as juniors were awarded the nenefit of senior and upper pay scale with effect from 04.03.2014 or seeking direction by this Hon’ble Court for promote these petitioners as similar situated employees have been awarded.”
3. At the outset learned counsel appearing for respondent-State submits that the writ application filed by the petitioners is misconceived and not maintainable in law for the reasons that petitioners have already been granted promotion, and therefore, they are not entitled
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
