Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
ALOK KUMAR SINHA, J
Arvind Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar through A.C.S Department of Education – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. counsel for both sides agree. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 2. direction for a timely and reasoned decision. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. writ application is disposed. (Para 9 , 10) |
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER
2 18-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent-State.
2. With consent of the parties, the present writ application is being disposed of at this stage itself.
3. The petitioners have prayed for grant of following relief :-
“3. To pay the salary from May, 2016 till today. And to any relief / reliefs for which the petitioner is entitled for.
4. After advancing some argument, Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for the aforesaid relief claimed in the present writ application, the petitioner is prepared to file a detail representation before the District Programme Officer (Establishment), Gopalganj (respondent No.3) and prays that if such application is filed, appropriate direction be issued to respondent No.3 to decide the representation on merit after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner within a fixed time frame.
5. To the aforesaid submissions made by learned counsel for t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
