SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 2660

PATNA HIGH COURT
ANIL KUMAR SINHA, J
Rajesh Sah @ Rajesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.74347 of 2024|PS. Case No.-103 Year-2023



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Prabhat Ranjan Singh
For the Respondents: Mr. Akshay Lal Pandit, Mr. Ajay Kumar Tiwari

Anticipatory bail granted based on the victim's consent and marriage after maturity.

Headnote:The application for anticipatory bail arises from Laxmipur Police Station Case No. 103 of 2023 alleging abduction under IPC Sections 366A, 504, 506, 34 and Section 8 of the POCSO Act. The petitioner claims a love relationship with the victim, who married him after attaining maturity. The court grants bail based on the victim's consenting marriage post-maturity.

Table of Content
1. marriage after maturity and consent. (Para 4 , 5)
2. court's inclination to grant bail. (Para 6)
3. granting of anticipatory bail. (Para 8)

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

3 18-12-2025 1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out of Laxmipur Police Station Case No. 103 of 2023, disclosing offences under Sections 366A , 504, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 8 of the POCSO, Act.

3. As per the allegation made in the FIR, on

10.03.2023, in the evening, the daughter of the informant, aged about 17 years, was kidnapped by the petitioner at gunpoint.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner and the victim girl was having love relationship for several years and the marriage of the victim girl was to be solemnized by her parents with a handicapped boy. Accordingly, the daughter of the informant voluntarily went with the petitioner while her age was 17 years and 5 months. After attaining the age of maturity, the victim girl solemnized marriage with the petitioner on 07.11.2023 in a temple in presence of family members of the petitioner and other well- wishers. The statement of the victim girl was recorded under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. in which she has stated that she has solemnized marriage with the petitioner after attaining the age of maturity.

5. On the other hand, learned counsel for the victim girl submits that it is true that the victim girl has solemnized marriage with the petitioner after attaining the age of maturity and both are living together as husband and wife.

6. Having regard to the submissions made on behalf of the parties and taking into consideration the fact that there was adolescent love between the petitioner and the victim girl and after attaining the age of maturity, the victim has solemnized marriage with the petitioner, I am inclined to grant the petitioner privilege of anticipatory bail. 7. This application is, accordingly, allowed.

8. Let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within four weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional District Judge-1st, Jamui, in connection with Laxmipur Police Station Case No. 103 of 2023, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure /Section 482(2) of the BNSS, 2023.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top