SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 2759

PATNA HIGH COURT
MR. BIBEK CHAUDHURI, MR. DR. ANSHUMAN, JJ
M/s Dina Mahabir Re-rollers Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
The Union Of India – Respondent
Miscellaneous Appeal No.374 of 2018|Miscellaneous Appeal No. 936 of 2024|Miscellaneous Appeal No. 944 of 2024|Miscellaneous Appeal No. 945 of 2024|Miscellaneous Appeal No. 946 of 2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.Suraj Samdarshi, Mr.Avinash Shekhar
For the Respondents: Mr.S.D Sanjay, Mr.Additional Solicitor General

A deceased individual cannot file an appeal; representation must be made by a legal heir.

Headnote:The court wrestled with the issue of a deceased appellant during the procedural proceedings of M.A. 936 of 2024, focusing on compliance with Rule 5(b) of Chapter 6 of the Patna High Court Rules. The court permitted Rajesh Kumar Kamalia to proceed with the appeal as the representative of his deceased father. The court confirmed the necessity of adhering to the provisions of Order 41 of the Code of Civil Procedure regarding the filing of an appeal on behalf of the deceased. The appeal will continue under the consideration of representation and the abatement of appeal will be reassessed along with the main appeal scheduled for February 12, 2026.

Table of Content
1. appellant must be alive to file an appeal. (Para 4)
2. representation allowed for deceased's appeal. (Para 5 , 6)

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIBEK CHAUDHURI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIBEK CHAUDHURI)

24 04-12-2025 M.A. 936 of 2024 was filed by a dead person, namely, Late Rajendra Prasad Kamalia. Since on the date of filing of the appeal, the appellant was dead, it is submitted on behalf of the appellant that it ought to be filed by the son of Late Rajendra Prasad Kamalia, since deceased, namely, Rajesh Kumar Kamalia in representative capacity of deceased Rajendra Kumar Kamalia.

2. Therefore, framing of appeal was not proper in view of Rule 5(b) Chapter 6 of the Patna High Court Rules.

3. The said Rajendra Prasad Kamalia died in the year

4th of February, 2019 and the application being I.A. No. 2 of

2025 has been filed praying for the above-mentioned relief on

2nd December, 2025.

4. It is needless to say that an appeal could not be filed by a dead person under the provision of order 41 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Though a judgement can be passed against the dead person if the suit or proceeding governed under the C.P.C is finally heard during the life time the deceased.

5. Be that as it may, we permit Rajesh Kumar Kamalia to continue with the instant appeal and the issue of abatement of appeal shall be considered along with the appeal as a representative capacity.

6. List this matter on 12th of February, 2026, under the appropriate heading.

(Bibek Chaudhuri, J)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top