SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 2779

PATNA HIGH COURT
Bibek Chaudhuri, Dr. Anshuman, JJ
Priyanka Devi @ Priyanka Pathak – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners:Mr. Niranjan Kumar, Advocate
For the Respondents:Mr. Pratik Kumar Sinha, AC to GA-5, Mr. Girish Pandey, Advocate
For Private Respondent:Mr. Amit Shrivastava, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Rajesh Kr. Mishra, Advocate

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIBEK CHAUDHURI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIBEK CHAUDHURI)

22 18-12-2025 Learned Advocate for the appellant and learned Advocate for the respondent are present.

2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that he is not pressing the I.A. 01 of 2024, I.A. 02 of 2024 and I.A. 03 of

2025.

3. Therefore, all the three I.As. (Interlocutory Applications) are dismissed as not pressed.

4. Learned Advocate for the appellant also submits that I.A. 04 of 2025 has wrongly been listed and earlier the same was disposed of.

5. Learned Advocate for the respondents submits that the Senior Advocate, Mr. Amit Shrivastava, has to argue this case, who is not available today.

6. Matter be listed on 08.01.2026, within top five cases under the same heading.

(Bibek Chaudhuri, J)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top