Bank Can Adjust OTS Deposit on Borrower Default, No Cheating u/s 420 IPC: Delhi High Court
02 Mar 2026
Divij Kumar Quits CMS INDUSLAW for Independent Practice
03 Mar 2026
Global Lawyers Debate AI Liability in Autonomous Vehicles
03 Mar 2026
CCPA Fines Startup ₹8 Lakh for False Child Growth Claims
05 Mar 2026
Madras High Court Scoffs at Police Custody Injury Claim
05 Mar 2026
India's Criminal Investigations Face Systemic Conviction Crisis
05 Mar 2026
Kerala HC Slams TDB Financial Discipline in Ayyappa Conclave, Orders Auditor Report on Past Anomalies: High Court of Kerala
06 Mar 2026
ST Members Can Invoke Section 13B HMA If Hinduised By Customs: Chhattisgarh High Court
06 Mar 2026
Lease Cancellation Valid Even by 'In-Charge' Mining Officer Under OMMC Rules: Orissa High Court
06 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
PATNA HIGH COURT
BIBEK CHAUDHURI, J
Rishu Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The Union of India through the Secretary – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIBEK CHAUDHURI ORAL ORDER
3 12-12-2025 The instant writ petition was fixed on the 3rd of December, 2025, at the top of the list vide order dated 27th of November, 2025. On 27th of November, 2025, the Court Master attached to this Court was on leave. The record was sent to the office. On 3rd of December, 2025, the case was not listed as per the direction of this Court. Thereafter, on 5th of December, 2025, upon mentioning, the case was listed under the heading “Admission” at the top of the list in serial no. 82. It is to be noted that the case was not listed under the heading “Fresh Cases” because the list was prepared by the office, and without considering the order dated 27th of November, 2025, the case was fixed under the heading “Admission.”
2. Subsequently, on three occasions, the petitioner mentioned the case for preponement. The case could not be preponed because of the fact that huge number of mentioning slips were pending for listing.
3. Today, Mr. Kumar Jay, learned Advocate for the petitioner, has me
Allegations against court officials must be substantiated; baseless claims undermine court integrity.
Lawyers are officers of Court; they are part of judiciary.
The judgment underscores the importance of proper legal representation in civil writ cases.
The court emphasized the right to timely resolution of pension claims for retired employees, acknowledging delays caused in typical proceedings.
Registry officials cannot decide case listings independently, ensuring transparency and preventing unfair practices; authority lies with the Chief Justice for case postings.
The court affirmed that the seniority list of advocates must not be disturbed for future chamber allotments, ensuring priority for those who originally applied in 2009.
The court recognizes the importance of maintaining judicial dignity and outlines procedures to ensure accountability in cases of contempt, recalling its order to allow for proper jurisdictional handl....
The ruling underscores the importance of adhering to procedural requirements in administrative appeals.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article