SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 2982

PATNA HIGH COURT
Bibek Chaudhuri, J
Prince Raj – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar & Ors. – Respondent
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 2519 of 2025|Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 5368 of 2025|Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 10813 of 2025|CWJC No.5733 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Deepak Kumar Singh, Mr. Samir Kumar, Mr. Nikesh Kumar, Mr. Akshansh Shankar, Mr. Lakmesh Marvind
For the Respondents: Mr. J.K. Roy-1, SC-13, Mr. Rajesh Roy, AC to SC-22, Mr. S.D. Yadav, AAG-9, Mr. Braj Bhushan Mishra, AC to AAG-9, Ms. Shrishti Singh

The court allows tagging of similar cases for efficient adjudication and sets timelines for responses in writ proceedings.

Headnote:This judgment pertains to Civil Writ Jurisdiction cases, wherein multiple petitions were filed against the State of Bihar and other respondents. The court invites counter-affidavits from specific respondents related to common issues. It has been agreed that similar pending cases will be heard together to ensure efficiency. Final directives issue on listing future proceedings.

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIBEK CHAUDHURI ORAL ORDER

4 17-12-2025 Heard the parties.

2. CWJC No.5733 of 2025, which is listed as item No.2 and this case cannot be heard with the writ petitions listed in Serial Nos.2.1 to 2.3 being CWJC Nos.2519 of 2025, CWJC No.5368 of 2025 and CWJC No.10813 of 2025. Therefore, item No.2 being CWJC No.5733 of 2025 be de-listed from Serial Nos.2.1 to 2.3 being CWJC Nos.2519 of 2025, CWJC No.5368 of 2025 and CWJC No.10813 of 2025.

3. Learned Advocates on behalf of the petitioners are present.

4. Ms. Shrishti Singh, learned Advocate submits that she has already received duly executed Vakalatnama from respondent Nos.9 and 10 and she will file the same by this week.

5. It is also submitted by her that respondent Nos.9 and 10 need to file counter affidavit against the instant writ petitions.

6. Therefore, the respondent Nos.9 and 10 be granted two weeks’ time after vacation to file counter affidavit and serve a copy of the same to the learned Advocate for the petitioners.

7. Petitioners are at liberty to file rejoinder to the said counter affidavit, if any, within one week, thereafter.

8. It is also submitted by the learned Advocate on behalf of the respondent Nos.9 and 10 that similar other cases on the same subject against the respondent Nos.9 and 10 are pending, where practically identical issues are involved. Therefore, these cases may be tagged together and heard analogously.

9. CWJC No.937 of 2025, CWJC No.1297 of 2025, CWJC No.3834 of 2025, CWJC No.4362 of 2025, CWJC No.2909 of 2025, CWJC No.3087 of 2025, CWJC No.8307 of 2025, CWJC No.8568 of 2024 be listed alongwith Serial Nos.2.1 to 2.3 being CWJC Nos.2519 of 2025, CWJC No.5368 of 2025 and CWJC No.10813 of 2025.

10. List these matters on 04.02.2026.

(Bibek Chaudhuri, J)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top