PATNA HIGH COURT
CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH, J
Bikram Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER
2 08-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Aurangabad Town P.S. Case No. 392 of 2025 dated 24.06.2025 registered for the offence/s punishable under Sections 303(2), 310(2) and 317(2)
of the B.N.S.
3. As per the prosecution case, unknown miscreant is alleged to have stolen the truck of the informant which was parked in front of Yamaha Showroom, Gandhi Nagar, Ward No.33 and said that, all original documents of truck were kept in the said truck.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The name of the petitioner has sprung up in this case on mere suspicion. No T.I.P. has been conducted by the prosecution. It is further submitted that in para-40 of the case diary, the confessional statement of the co-accused Kundan Kumar @ Raj Kumar Raju has been recorded, on the basis of which the stolen truck was recovered from the garage of Sanjay Body Builder, Golpur Road. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.