SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 3322

PATNA HIGH COURT
Jitendra Kumar, J
Md. Ibran @ Imran – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.5263 of 2023



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners:Mr. Rana Pratap Singh, Advocate, Mr. Satyaveer, Advocate
For the Respondents: Mr. Ramchandra Singh

The court establishes the importance of timely filing appeals while considering delays due to custody circumstances under IPC and POCSO matters.

Headnote:The Court allowed the interlocutory application for condonation of delay of 950 days in filing the appeal. The appellant was convicted under provisions of Section 376 IPC and Section 4 of POCSO Act, receiving a ten-year sentence, as per the order dated 30.11.2023. Issues related to procedural delay and considerations for timely appeal were examined, ultimately resulting in the appeal being admitted and the trial court record being sought.

Table of Content
1. court's direction for record submission and re-notification. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
2. final order for timely record submission. (Para 9)

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER

5 04-12-2025 I.A. No. 1 of 2025 The present Interlocutory Application has been filed for condonation of delay of 950 days in filing the present Appeal against the Judgment of conviction dated 29.11.2022 and order of sentence dated 30.11.2023 passed in POCSO Case No. 45 of 2019 arising out of Naugachia Mahila P.S. Case No. 12 of 2019 by learned Exclusive Special Judge, POCSO Act-cum-VIIth Additional District & Sessions Judge, Bhagalpur, whereby the Appellant has been found guilty for the offence punishable under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the POCSO Act and he has been sentenced to undergo ten years of rigorous imprisonment and he has been in custody for the reasons stated in the application.

2. Delay is condoned for the reasons as stated in the application.

3. Accordingly, I.A. No. 1 of 2025 stands disposed of.

CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.5263 of 2023

4. Heard learned counsel for the Appellant on admission.

5. The appeal is admitted.

6. Put up this case for hearing.

7. Issue notice to the Opposite Party No.2 on steps to be taken by the Petitioner within a period of two weeks by both modes i.e., under ordinary process as well as registered cover with A/D.

8. In the meantime, call for the Trial Court Record from Ld. Principal District and Sessions Judge, Bhagalpur, in connection with Naugachia Mahila P.S. Case No. 12 of 2019, pending in the Court of learned Exclusive Special Judge, POCSO Act-cum-VIIth Additional District & Sessions Judge, Bhagalpur and re-notify this case after receipt of the same on

22.01.2026.

9. The Trial Court Record must reach in time, without fail.

(Jitendra Kumar, J.)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top