Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
MR. KHATIM REZA, J
SAVO DEVI and ORS – Appellant
Versus
Anwar Imam – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. condonation of delay for substitution petitions. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. court allowed applications for substitution. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. listing and procedural directions for further actions. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA ORAL ORDER
14 05-12-2025 I.A. No. 5 of 2025
1. This interlocutory application has been filed under order XXII, Rule 4(4) of the Code of Civil Procedure for exemption of filing substitution petition with regard to deceased respondent no. 20 namely, Ram Kishun who died during the pendency of this appeal.
2. Learned counsel for the appellant further submitted that respondent no. 20 neither appeared nor filed written statement nor contested the matter at any stage of the proceedings.
3. Considering the aforesaid facts and averments made in the interlocutory application, the interlocutory application is allowed.
4. Office is directed to delete the name of respondent no. 20 from the memo of appeal at the risk of the appellant.
I.A. No. 4 of 2024
5. This interlocutory application has been filed for substituting the name of the heirs of respondent no. 1, namely, Mazhar Imam who died on 19.01.2020 leaving behind his heirs and legal
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
