Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
HONOURABLE MR. KHATIM REZA, J
Sri Baban Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
Jitendra Bhagat – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. ownership dispute and fraudulent sale deed (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. trial court's findings on evidence (Para 9 , 10) |
| 3. appellate court's reversal of trial court decision (Para 11 , 12) |
| 4. discussion on statutory limitations (Para 13) |
| 5. final evaluation of evidence and dismissal (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 6. order of dismissal (Para 17 , 18) |
ORDER
7 22-12-2025
Heard learned counsel for the appellants.
2. The present Second Appeal has been preferred against the judgment and decree dated 21.02.2015 passed by the learned Vth Additional District Judge, Aurangabad in Title Appeal No. 40 of 2006/43 of 2014 whereby the judgment and decree dated 12.05.2006 passed by learned Munsif, Aurangabad in Title Suit No. 121 of 1995 has been reversed and the suit has been dismissed with cost on contest.
3. The defendants are the appellants in the instant Second Appeal.
4. The plaintiffs-respondents filed Title Suit No. 121 of 1995 to declare the sale deed dated 15.09.1979 as illegal, fraudulent, ab initio void, inoperative and obtained by impersonation as well as other reliefs.
5. In order to appreciate the case in its proper perspective, it is necessary to briefly restate the case of the plainti
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
