SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 3445

PATNA HIGH COURT
KHATIM REZA, J
Tarkeshwar Ray – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.Rakesh Kumar
For the Respondents: Mr.Mukesh Kumar Singh

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA ORAL ORDER

2 22-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with Nayagaon PS. Case No. 202 of 2025 dated 24-10-2025, instituted under Section 30 (a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act,2022.

3. The allegation is of recovery of 80 litres of country-

made liquor from the Diyara region at village Chirpakar.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that no incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner or from his house. The petitioner has no concern with the allegedly recovered country-made liquor, which was recovered from an abandoned place easily accessible to anyone. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been arrayed as an accused in this case only due to his past history. Lastly, it is submitted that four criminal cases of a similar nature are pending against the petitioner, in which he is already on bail.

5. Learned APP has opposed the prayer for bail.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top