PATNA HIGH COURT
MOHIT KUMAR SHAH, SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA, JJ
Ranjeet Yadav – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court doubts the conviction based on insufficient medical and forensic evidence. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 2. the appeal concludes with the suspension of sentence, granting bail to the appellant. (Para 9) |
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH)
8 01-12-2025 Heard the learned counsel for the appellant, Ms. Priya as also the learned APP for the State, Ms. Shashibala Verma and the learned Amicus Curiae, Ms. Aditi Sharma.
2. The present appeal has been preferred against the judgment of conviction and the order of sentence dated 29.10.2024 and 30.10.2024 respectively passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-VI-cum-Special Judge POCSO Act, Patna in Special POCSO Case No. 7 of 2018 (arising out of Pandarak P.S. Case No. 68 of 2017) whereby and whereunder the appellant has been convicted under Section 376 D of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as the ‘I.P.C.’) and Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act , 2012 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘POCSO Act, 2012’) and he has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 20 years un
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.