SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 3555

PATNA HIGH COURT
NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY, J
Ali Hassan Gaddi alias Ali Hassan Mian – Appellant
Versus
Hamid Gaddi – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Gaurav Prakash
For the Respondents: Mr. Sanjeev Kumar

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER

8 12-12-2025 Re:- I.A. No. 02 of 2025 The present interlocutory application has been filed for substitution of opposite party Nos. 7 and 13, namely Mostt. Rabusami and Ismail Gaddi, who have passed away. Their heirs and legal representatives have been described in paragraphs 3 and 4 of the application.

2. The interlocutory application is allowed Accordingly, the name of opposite party No. 7 be deleted from the array of respondents. The legal representatives of opposite party no. 7 are already on record.

3. The name of respondent No. 13 is directed to be substituted with his/her legal heirs and representatives, as described in paragraph 4 of the interlocutory application.

4. Let the notice be issued to the newly added heirs and legal representatives of opposite party No. 13 for which, requisites etc under registered cover as well as under ordinary process must be filed within a period of two weeks.

5. List this matter after eight weeks.

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top