PATNA HIGH COURT
Mr. Partha Sarthy, J
Rajesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to disciplinary punishment procedures. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. preliminary objection regarding alternative remedy. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. withdrawal of application with liberty to appeal. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER
2 08-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The petitioner has filed the instant application for the following relief(s) :-
“1. That, this writ application is directed against the contained in Memo no. 16257 dated 29.08.2025 issued under the signature of the respondent Secretary whereby and where under the petitioner has been awarded the punishment of Censor (For the Year, 2022-23) and withhold three annual increments with cumulative effect, this apart, the decision for regularization of the period of suspension kept pending, erroneously, in an arbitrary manner, without the charge so leveled being proved. The order has been passed in utter violation of the provisions of the Bihar Government Servants Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 2005 (herein after referred to as the CCA Rules).
Admittedly, neither the presenting officer nor any witness proved the charge or the opportunity of examination/ cros
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.