SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 3645

PATNA HIGH COURT
Prabhat Kumar Singh, J
Mahesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51046 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Abhishek Kumar
For the Respondents: Mr. Syed Mojibur Rahman

The court allowed bail based on insufficient specific evidence and established parity with co-accused.

Headnote:In this matter concerning the grant of bail in a case under Section 307 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act, the Court noted the general nature of the accusations and the lack of specific overt acts attributed to the petitioner. It was observed that parity had been established with similarly situated co-accused, and the petitioner had been in custody since April 28, 2025. The Court primarily determined that the evidence against the petitioner was insufficient for denial of bail and thus granted the pray for bail. The court emphasized that considering the facts presented, the bail was allowed subject to conditions.

Result: The petitioner was directed to be released on bail after submitting the requisite bail-bond and sureties.

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

3 01-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act .

3. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that this petitioner, along with other F.I.R. named accused persons and three to four unknown persons, fired upon the informant as a result of which he sustained three gun shot injuries.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. As a matter of fact, due to land dispute between the parties, this false and concocted case has been lodged. Allegation of firing is general and omnibus and no specific accusation of overt act has been alleged against this petitioner. As per F.I.R., seven accused persons are alleged to have fired upon the informant, however, the informant sustained only three gun shot injuries which itself falsifies the entire prosecution case. Moreover, similarly situated co-accused person, namely Suraj Kumar, has already been granted bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court vide order dated 22.09.2022 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 36745 of 2022. Charge-sheet has already been submitted and petitioner is in custody since 28.04.2025.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, general and omnibus nature of accusation, claim based on parity and period of custody, the prayer for grant bail of to the petitioner is allowed.

7. Accordingly, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Motihari, East Champaran in connection with Harsidhi P.S. Case No. 157 of

2022.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top