SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 3727

PATNA HIGH COURT
PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH, J
Birbal Yadav – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Amrendra Kumar
For the Respondents: Mr. Rabindra Kumar

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

2 09-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners seek bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 61(2), 103(1), 238 and 3(5)

of the B.N.S. .

3. As per prosecution case, on 28.03.2025 at about

12:45 PM in the afternoon, when the informant along with his wife were grazing their cattle in the field, in the meantime, he received information that his minor daughter, namely Nanki Devi, aged about 16 years, was murdered by all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including these petitioners. Upon receiving the information, the informant immediately rushed to his house where he found the dead body of his daughter lying on the ground and all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including these petitioners, were present there.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. From bare perusal of the F.I.R. it is apparent that informant is not an eye witness to the occurrence and he has not disclosed as to how he came to know that these petitioners have committed the alleged offence. A

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top