SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 3743

PATNA HIGH COURT
Prabhat Kumar Singh, J
Rohit Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.77170 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Ajit Kumar Sinha
For the Respondents: Mr. Parmeshwar Mehta, APP

Anticipatory bail granted based on innocence and clean antecedents of the accused, considering the nature of allegations.

Headnote:The court addressed the application for anticipatory bail under Section 303(2) of the B.N.S. and Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act concerning the petitioners accused of black marketing. The court found the petitioners innocent and allowed anticipatory bail considering their clean antecedents. The critical issue framed was the nature of the accusation against the petitioners. The court held that given the circumstances, anticipatory bail was warranted.

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

2 11-12-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 303(2) of the B.N.S. and Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act .

3. As per prosecution case, Petitioner No. 1 is owner and Petitioner No. 2 is driver of the tractor which was seized loaded with 40 bags of Arwa rice which was taken for the purpose of black marketing.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. As a matter of fact, petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case merely because Petitioner No. 1 is owner and Petitioner No. 2 is driver of the seized tractor. Petitioners are not P.D.S. dealer and were not aware of the nature of consignment and have got no concern with the seized grains. Petitioners claim clean antecedents.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of accusation and clean antecedents of the petitioners, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is allowed.

7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria in connection with Alauli P.S. Case No. 281 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section

482(2) of the B.N.S. S..

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top