PATNA HIGH COURT
Prabhat Kumar Singh, J
Chandrakant Ray @ Bhuvan Ray – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER
2 11-12-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 118(2), 74, 303(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. .
3. As per prosecution case, on the alleged date and time of occurrence, all these accused-petitioners abused and assaulted informant and his family members and also snatched cash.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. As a matter of fact, both parties are Gotiya and petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case with ulterior motive. Allegation of assault is general and omnibus and injuries, allegedly caused by Petitioner Nos. 1 and 2, are simple in nature. Rest of the allegations are ornamental in order to make the case grave. Petitioners claim clean antecedents.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners and submitted that petitioners are named
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.