SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 3750

PATNA HIGH COURT
Prabhat Kumar Singh, J
Chandrakant Ray @ Bhuvan Ray – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Sameer Ranjan
For the Respondents: Mr. Jai Narain Thakur, APP

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

2 11-12-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 118(2), 74, 303(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. .

3. As per prosecution case, on the alleged date and time of occurrence, all these accused-petitioners abused and assaulted informant and his family members and also snatched cash.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. As a matter of fact, both parties are Gotiya and petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case with ulterior motive. Allegation of assault is general and omnibus and injuries, allegedly caused by Petitioner Nos. 1 and 2, are simple in nature. Rest of the allegations are ornamental in order to make the case grave. Petitioners claim clean antecedents.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners and submitted that petitioners are named

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top