Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH, J
Anushka Devi Pradeep Kumar @ Guddu Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. arguments regarding generality of accusations against petitioners (Para 5 , 8) |
| 2. circumstances of the alleged dowry death (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. decision on bail based on clean antecedents (Para 9) |
| 4. final ruling on the application for anticipatory bail (Para 10 , 11) |
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER
2 18-12-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.
2. At the outset, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this anticipatory bail application on behalf of Petitioner No. 3, namely Pradeep Kumar, as during pendency of this case, Petitioner No. 3 has already been arrested and the same has become infructuous.
3. Permission, as prayed for, is accorded.
4. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application with regard to Petitioner No. 3 stands dismissed as withdrawn.
5. Petitioner Nos. 1, 2 and 4 apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 103 , 80 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. .
6. It is a case of dowry death. As per prosecution case, informant alleged that marriage of his daughter was solemnized with co-acc
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
