SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 3856

PATNA HIGH COURT
Purnendu Singh, J
Anoop Kumar @ Anup Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.82343 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.Arvind Kumar
For the Respondents: Mr.Anuj Kumar Shrivastava, APP

Pre-arrest bail granted under specific conditions while considering allegations of false implication and the recovery of contraband.

Headnote:Statute Analysis: The petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in connection with Jadopur P.S.Case No.173 of 2025 for offences under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. Facts: 286 liters of country-made liquor were recovered, and the petitioner argued innocence, claiming false implication. Findings: The court considered all submissions and allowed bail on specific conditions.

Issues: Whether the petitioner qualifies for pre-arrest bail based on the presented facts and arguments.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for judicial review of antecedents and the conditions set under Section 438 of Cr.P.C.

Result: The petitioner is directed to be released on pre-arrest bail, subject to conditions.

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER

2 10-12-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in connection with Jadopur P.S.Case No.173 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Section 30 (a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act , 2022.

3. The prosecution story in short is that 286 ltrs. of country-made liquor has been recovered from eight sacks, which were being carried by eight persons near Chhath Ghat.

4. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. The name of the petitioner has been disclosed by the local Chowkidar. Learned counsel further submitted that the petitioner has no concern with the seized liquor. Petitioner has clean antecedent.

5. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail.

6. Having considered the rival submissions of the parties, as well as, considering the allegation made in the FIR and total 286 ltrs. of country-made liquor recovered from sacks, the petitioner is directed to be released on pre-arrest bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the district court within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned District and Addl. Sessions Judge XIII cum Spl. Excise Court No.I, Gopalganj in connection with Jadopur P.S.Case No.173 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C./Section 482(2) of BNSS .

7. The learned district court is directed to verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and if it is found that the petitioner is involved in some other cases as what has been stated in paragraph No.3 of the bail application, this order will automatically lose its force.

(Purnendu Singh, J)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top