SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 3876

PATNA HIGH COURT
PURNEINDU SINGH, J
Madan Kumar Yadav @ Madan Rai – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Bihar – Respondent
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.83324 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.Prasoon Kumar
For the Respondents: Ms.Pushpa Sinha, APP

The court determines that prima facie grounds existed for pre-arrest bail under conditions addressing public accessibility to the site of recovery.

Headnote:The court addresses a petition for pre-arrest bail concerning a charge under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, arising from the recovery of illicit liquor from a public field. The court finds, prima facie, grounds for granting bail despite opposition from the prosecution. The court’s main issue is whether the petitioner should be granted bail considering his alleged innocence and the circumstances of recovery. The court holds that the petitioner meets the criteria for pre-arrest bail, conditionally ordering release upon the fulfillment of certain bail conditions.

2 17-12-2025 Heard Mr. Prasoon Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Ms. Pushpa Sinha, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in connection with Excise P.S. Case No. 1391/2025 registered for the offence(s) punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act .

3. As per the allegation made in the FIR, 126 litres of illicit liquor was recovered from a field.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. He further submitted that recovery of illicit liquor has been made from a field, which is an open space and is easily accessible by anyone. Petitioner has no concern either with the place of recovery or with the alleged recovered liquor.

5. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail.

6. Having considered the rival submissions made on behalf of the parties, as well as, having perused the allegation made in the FIR and also the fact that recovery of illicit liquor has been made from a field, which is easily accessible by anyone, I am of the opinion that petitioner has, prima facie, made out a case to be released on pre-arrest bail.

7. The petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on pre-arrest bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned District Court within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Concerned Court where the case is pending in connection with Excise P.S. Case No. 1391/2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS .

8. The learned District Court is directed to verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and if it is found that the petitioner is involved in some other cases, as what has been stated in paragraph no.3 of the bail application, this order will automatically lose its force.

(Purnendu Singh, J)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top