SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 3912

PATNA HIGH COURT
PURNDENDU SINGH, J
Akhilesh Kumar Yadav – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Md. Musowir
For the Respondents: Mr. Rana Randhir Singh, APP

2 22-12-2025 Heard Mr. Md. Musowir, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Rana Randhir Singh, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in connection with Manihari P.S. Case No. 61/2024 registered for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 323 , 341 and 365 of the Indian Penal Code .

3. As per the allegation made in the FIR, the informant has stated that his daughter was married with the petitioner. His son-in-law (petitioner) works in Delhi. In the meantime, her in-laws physically abused his daughter and threw away from her matrimonial house on 03.03.2024 and since then she is missing.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. He further submitted that it is clear from the FIR that on the date of occurrence, the petitioner was in Delhi and there is no allegation against him. He further submitted that daughter of the informant was not missing, rather she went to her parents house and she was present there on the date of FIR and just to harass the petitioner and his family members, the present FIR has been lodged. Prior to the pre

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top