SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 3974

PATNA HIGH COURT
Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J
Ramesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
North Bihar Power Distribution Company Limited – Respondent
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No. 3508 of 2019 | Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17889 of 2018 | Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No. 3512 of 2019 | Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17412 of 2018 | Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No. 3513 of 2019 | Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17229 of 2018 | Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No. 3515 of 2019 | Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17825 of 2018 | Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No. 3516 of 2019 | Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17851 of 2018 | Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No. 3517 of 2019 | Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17227 of 2018 | Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17229 of 2018 | Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No. 3520 of 2019 | Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17767 of 2018 | Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No. 3521 of 2019 | Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17821 of 2018 | Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No. 3522 of 2019 | Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17823 of 2018 | Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No. 3524 of 2019 | Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17796 of 2018 | Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No. 3578 of 2019 | Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17243 of 2018 | Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17229 of 2018



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.Nikhil Kumar Agrawal
For the Respondents:Mr.P.K. Shahi, Sr. Advocate, Mr.Anand Kumar Ojha, Sr. Advocate

The court's procedural ruling emphasizes the importance of compliance and adjournments for adequate representations in multiple cases.

Headnote:The Court analyzed multiple writ petitions against North Bihar Power Distribution Company Limited challenging certain actions. The petitions were presented by various petitioners with common representation by counsel. The court adjourned to allow for further instructions. Key issues included compliance and procedural adherence (Paragraphs 1-4). The final outcome was a decision to list the matters again on 16.01.2026.

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Nikhil Kumar Agrawal For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.P.K. Shahi, Sr. Advocate Mr. Anand Kumar Ojha, Sr. Advocate CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER

7 12-12-2025 The alleged contemnors are present through virtual mode.

2. Mr. P. K. Shahi, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. Anand Kumar Ojha, learned counsel has addressed this Court.

3. In view of what has transpired, in order to enable them to seek instructions, these matters are being adjourned to

16.01.2026.

4. List accordingly.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)

arvind/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top