Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, Sourendra Pandey, JJ
Om Prakash Ram – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. discussion on the arguments regarding the appellant's identification in the fir. (Para 5 , 6 , 8) |
| 2. court's initial observations indicating insufficient direct evidence against the appellant. (Para 7 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. court's decision to grant bail based on preliminary findings. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD)
8 17-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Bihar.
2. Records of this case have been placed before this Court to consider the prayer of the appellant for suspension of his sentence and release on bail during pendency of the appeal.
3. The appellant has been convicted vide judgment dated 28.02.2024 and sentenced vide order dated 06.03.2024 by learned A.D.J.-VI-cum-Special Judge, POCSO, Bettiah (West Champaran) in connection with S.G.R. No. 307 of 2020, CIS POCSO No. 107 of 2019 arising out of Bettiah Mahila P.S. Case No. 14 of 2019 for the offences punishable under Sections 376D /120B of the Indian Penal Code (in short ‘IPC’) and Sections 4 /17 and 6/17 of the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
