SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 4023

PATNA HIGH COURT
Sudhir Singh, ACJ, Rajesh Kumar Verma, J
Baua Jha – Appellant
Versus
The Union of India – Respondent
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18099 of 2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Prashant Sinha
For the Respondents: Mr. P.K. Shahi, AG
For the State Commission: Mr. Sanjay Singh Thakur

Court confirmed the necessity of timely appointments for consumer commission members under existing regulations.

Headnote:The Court examined the applicability of Rule-10 of the Consumer Protection (Qualification for Appointment, Method of Recruitment, Procedure of Appointment, Term of Office, Resignation and Removal of President and Members of the State Commission and District Commission) Rule, 2020, which mandates a four-year term and a maximum age limit of 65 years. The petitioner sought a direction for continuing the current members until appointments were finalized. It was found that the Bihar Public Service Commission had already initiated the appointment process. Hence, no further orders were needed.

Result: The writ application is disposed of.

Table of Content
1. the writ filed seeks clarity on appointment rules for consumer commission members. (Para 1)
2. the respondent's statements outline the ongoing appointment process for members. (Para 2)
3. the court observed the adequacy of existing processes for appointments. (Para 3)
4. the writ application was disposed of with expectations for timely finalization of appointments. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)

CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE)

7 08-12-2025 The present writ application has been filed in the form of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) for the following reliefs:-

(i) For necessary direction upon the respondent authorities to allow the retiring Presidents and Members of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commissions in Bihar and the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Bihar to continue on their posts until fresh appointments are made subject to final decision in SLP No.

25612/2023(Ganeshkumar Rajeshwarrao Selukar and others Vs. Mahendra Bhashkar Limaye and others).

(ii) For declaring the Rule-10 of the Consumer Protection (Qualification for Appointment, Method of Recruitment, Procedure of Appointment, Term of Office, Resignation and Removal of President and Members of the State Commission and District Commission) Rule, 2020 (hereinafter to be referred to as 2020 Rules), which provides for a term of four years for the Members and President of the State Commission and District Commission to be not applicable in view of the same being struck down by the Nagpur Bench of the Hon'ble Bombay High Court.

(iii) For declaring that provision of Rule-10 of Consumer Protection (Qualification for Appointment, Method of Recruitment, Procedure of Appointment, Term of Office, Resignation and Removal of President and Members of the State Commission and District Commission) Rule, 2020, which provides for the maximum age limit of 65 years for the President and Members to hold the post to be not applicable till the issue is finally decided by the Hon'ble Supreme Court.

(iv) For any other direction, which your Lordships may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.

2. A supplementary counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the Respondent Nos. 2 & 3, wherein the following statements have been made in paragraph nos. 6 &

10:-

"6. That vide Letter No. 5167 dated 29.11.2024 the department of deponent has sent the requisition before the Bihar Public Service Commission, Patna for issuance of advertisement related to appointment for the judicial member of one post in the State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission and for of the President & Member against the vacant posts of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission vide Letter No. 5457 dated 20.12.2024 the department of deponent requested the Bihar Public Service Commission, Patna to provide the up to date status of process of appointment of the judicial member against the vacant posts of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission and the President & Member of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commissions on the requisition as earlier sent.

10. That it is further submitted that the BPSC has conducted the examination on 03.05.2025, 04.05.2025 and 05.05.2025 appointment of the judicial member in the State Consumer Redressal Commission as well as for the appointment of 18 and 38 member in the District Consumer Redressal Commission."

3. Considering the fact that the process for appointment of President and Members has already been initiated by the Bihar Public Service Commission and is presently underway, no further order is required to be passed in this writ application.

4. The writ application is, accordingly, disposed of.

5. It is expected that the authorities concerned shall make all earnest efforts to ensure that the appointments are finalized at the earliest.

6. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

(Sudhir Singh, ACJ)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top