Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
Sudhir Singh, ACJ, Rajesh Kumar Verma, J
Baua Jha – Appellant
Versus
The Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the writ filed seeks clarity on appointment rules for consumer commission members. (Para 1) |
| 2. the respondent's statements outline the ongoing appointment process for members. (Para 2) |
| 3. the court observed the adequacy of existing processes for appointments. (Para 3) |
| 4. the writ application was disposed of with expectations for timely finalization of appointments. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE)
7 08-12-2025 The present writ application has been filed in the form of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) for the following reliefs:-
(i) For necessary direction upon the respondent authorities to allow the retiring Presidents and Members of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commissions in Bihar and the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Bihar to continue on their posts until fresh appointments are made subject to final decision in SLP No.
25612/2023(Ganeshkumar Rajeshwarrao Selukar and others Vs. Mahendra Bhashkar Limaye and others).
(ii) For declaring the Rule-10 of the Consumer Protection (Qualification for Appointment, Method of
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
