Writs sought to protect legal rights related to mutation and land possession.

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER

5 02-12-2025 Heard the parties.

2.The present petition has been preferred for the following relief/s:

(i) for issuance of writ in the nature of certiorari or any other appropriae writ setting aside both the orders dated 22.07.2016 passed in BLT Case No. 1172 of 2015 by Sri K.P. Ramaiah, Member Administrative. The Bihar Land Tribunal, Patna, by which order dated 30.08.2014 passed by the learned Court of Commissioner, Magadh Division, Gaya in Land Dispute Resolution Appeal no. 303/2012 has been confirmed against the facts and law of the case on perverse finding that petitioner went before D.C.L.R. under B.L.D.R. Act;

(ii) for issuance of writ in the nature of Mandamus of any ether appropriate wit directing the respondents to act upon the legal and valid Mutation in the name of petitioner and not to harass and humiliate the petitioner in the matter of his legal and valid Mutation;

(iii) for issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ directing the respondents to protect the continuous khatiyan which has been legally created in favour of the petitioner till any contrary order is passed by competent authority;

(iv) for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ directing respondents to protect the petitioner's legal right and possession arising from his legal mutation done in consonance of order of mutation passed by DCLR, Gaya which has been disturbed by the impugned orders;

(v) for issuance of any appropriate writ in favour of the petitioner as your lordships deems fit and proper.

3. This application shall be heard.

4. Since the State as also the respondents no. 7 to 10 have appeared, no notice is required.

5. Pleadings to be exchanged in six months. 6. Rule is made returnable within one year.

(Rajiv Roy, J)