PATNA HIGH COURT
Rajiv Roy, J
Rajeev Kumar Gupta and Anr – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Bihar and Ors – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. government claims no land acquisition occurred. (Para 3) |
| 2. court concludes no acquisition based on government assertion. (Para 5) |
| 3. court disposes the writ petition. (Para 6) |
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER
2 09-12-2025 Heard Mr. Krishna Deo Raj, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Singh representing the State as also Mr.
Priyadarshi representing the respondent no. 3.
2. The present application has been preferred for the following relief(s):
for issuance of appropriate writs/orders/directions in the nature of writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to make payment of Land Acquisition Compensation amount for acquiring of 28.5 decimals of land for construction of bridge/Pul over south middle of plot and 13.5 decimal for construction of road towards south east approaching Pul over the land in Mauza Katakosh, Tauri No. 38, Thana no. 246, Khata no. 582, Khesara no. 3000, area 4.72 Acres, Jamabandi no. 3559 in the name of petitioner no. 2 Dinanath Gupta father of petitioner no. 1 and this land was acquired without notice and bridge and road constructed in the name of H.I.R.C.C Bridge (3 x 16.50) in 1" cutting in 7th K.M. of Manihari Amdabad Roa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.