SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 4297

PATNA HIGH COURT
Rajiv Roy, J
Nitesh Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Sudhanshu Prakash
For the Respondents: Mr. Bharat Bhushan, APP

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER

4 19-12-2025 Heard Mr, Sudhanshu Prakash, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Bharat Bhushan, learned APP.

2. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Town P.S. Case No. 596 of 2021 for the offence punishable under Sections 420 , 379, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code lodged on 10.08.2021 by the informant, Meena Kumari.

3. The factual matrix of this case is that the informant, namely, Mina Kumari retired Professor, submitted a written/typed report to the officer-in-charge Cyber Crime Department, Bihar and Town P.S., Muzaffarpur against unknown offender including the officials of telephone department and the concerned Bank (in which the informant has savings bank account bearing no. 033400000045635), the Punjab National Bank, Jawaharlal Road, Muzaffarpur regarding online fraud committed against her savings account whereby huge amount of her savings to the tune of Rs. 1 crore 7 lakh and 75 thousands was fraudulently withdrawn through RTGS mode in between 10.06.2021 to 15.06.2021. It has also been alleged that the informant came to know about online fraud when she went to P.N.B. Khabra Road branch for withdr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top