IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL REVISION No.90 of 2017 ======================================================

1. Krishna Kumar Sinha and Ors S/o Mahesh Kumar

2. Mithilesh Kumar Singh S/o Jagarnath Kumar

3. Ram Bhajan Prasad S/o Janki Mathon

4.1. Shashi kumar Son of late Subhash Prasad Singh and Late Indu Devi resident of Mohalla- Ghugharitand, Raj Kumar Colony, P.O. Chand Chaura, P.S.

Vishnupad, District- Gaya.

4.2. Ajit Kumar Son of late Subhash Prasad Singh and Late Indu Devi resident of Mohalla- Ghugharitand, Raj Kumar Colony, P.O. Chand Chaura, P.S.

Vishnupad, District- Gaya.

5. Ramawatar Prasad S/o Heera Prasad

6. Harisankar Mehta @ Harishankar Prasad Mehta S/o Ramkundan Prasad Mehta

7. Gopal Singh S/o Ram Kishuan Singh 8. Kanta Singh S/o Ram Kishuan Singh

9. Nandu Prasad S/o Mahaveer Prasad

10. Purnima Devi W/o Ramchandra Prasad 11. Sankar Prasad S/o Shiv Nandan prasad

12. Manokamna Sinha W/o Rakesh Raushan

13. Ravinandan Kumar S/o Krishna Nandan Prasad

14. Satya Narayan Kumar S/o Sita Ram Prasad

15. Ramasish Prasad S/o Sita Ram Prasad

16. Baleshwar Prasad S/o Jagdish Mehta

17. Suresh Praasd S/o Jagdish Mehta

18. Sindhu Kumari W/o Ajay Kumar Verma

19. Pramila Devi W/o Anil Singh

20. Savo devi W/o Uma Shankar Prasad

21. Divakar Prasad S/o Durga Prasad All are Resident of Mohalla-Ghugharitand, Raj Kumar Colony, P.O. Chand Chaura, P.S. Vishnupad, District-gaya ... ... Petitioner/s Versus

2.1. Vipendra Paswan @ Biththal Paswan Son of late Bhagwan Paswan, Resident of Mohalla Ghugharitand, P.S. Vishnupad, District- Gaya.

2.2. Bhola Paswan Son of Late Bhagwan Paswan, Resident of Mohalla Ghugharitand, P.S. Vishnupad, District- Gaya.

3. Dinesh Chandra Pathak 4. Krishna Chandra Pathak

5. Radha Krishna Pathak

6. Kusum Devi W/o Gopal Saran 7. Kusum Devi W/o Naresh Rajak

8. Jaya Tiwari S/o Dhirendra KUmar Tiwari

9. Tara Kumari W/o Sunil Kumar Verma

10. Surendra Prasad S/o Chandeshwar Singh

11. Madhusudan Prasad S/o Kapildeo Narayan

12. Bhagwan Prasad Singh S/o Mahadeo Mahton

13. Radhika Devi W/o Nirmal Prasad All are Resident of Mohalla-

Ghugharitand, Raj Kumar Colony, P.O. Chand Chaura, P.s. Vishnipad, District-gaya ... ... Respondent/s ======================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jitendra Kishore Verma, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Sinha No.3, Advocate ======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA CAV ORDER

20 02-12-2025 Heard learned counsel on behalf of the petitioner and learned counsel for plaintiffs/respondents 1^st set.

2. The present civil revision is directed against the order dated 04.04.2017 passed by learned court of sub- judge III, Gaya in Title Suit Case No. 75 of 2016/569 of 2016, whereby and whereunder, the petition of some of the petitioners/defendants under order VII rule XI of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (hereinafter CPC) for rejection of the plaint has been rejected holding thereby that on the basis of the pleadings and the documents which form the basis of the plaint, it cannot be said that the plaint can be rejected at the initial stage itself and the fact of knowledge of the plaintiff regarding the execution of the sale deed is to be decided in the course of trial.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner in the instant case submitted that the learned trial court committed illegality in refusing the application for rejection of plaint under order VII rule XI of the CPC, and therefore, the impugned order is illegal, improper and against the mandatory provisions of law and is liable to be set aside. The learned trial court failed to appreciate the fact that the plaintiffs/respondents 1^st set have sought a very vague relief “B” where they have prayed for declaration of the sale deeds executed by Raj Kumar Pandey or their transferees if any to be canceled as void ab initio as in the whole body of plaint there is no mention of any detail or particulars of the any sale deed executed in favour of the petitioners/def