SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 4341

PATNA HIGH COURT
RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA, J
Shazad Alam – Appellant
Versus
Sadab Alam – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Manoj Kumar
For the Respondent: Mr. Alexander Ashok

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER

6 04-12-2025 Learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the respondent no. 7 are present.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners fairly submits that notices against contesting respondent nos. 1 to 21 has already been served and the remaining respondents are not essentially or necessary party, so there is no requirement for service of notice.

3. At the risk of the petitioners, notices were not required to be issued to the respondent nos. 22 to 32.

4. List this case on 29.01.2026.

(Ramesh Chand Malviya, J)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top