SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 4373

PATNA HIGH COURT
RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA, J
Dharmendra Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48744 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Yogendra Kumar Singh
For the Respondents: Mr. Anil Kumar

Bail granted based on custody duration and lack of prior criminal record.

Headnote:This case involves a bail application in connection with Paliganj P.S. Case No. 285 of 2022 concerning offences under the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner, a member of the Execution and Management Samiti, contends innocence regarding misappropriation allegations. The court determined that, considering the petitioner's custody period and lack of criminal antecedents, bail should be granted. The key issue was whether the petitioner poses a flight risk or threat to the judicial process, leading to the final decision to grant bail with specific conditions.

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER

6 01-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and perused the case diary.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Paliganj P.S. Case No. 285 of 2022, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 419 , 420, 409 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code .

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that the petitioner along with other co-accused person has misappropriated Rs.

13,78,500/- under Mukhyamantri Payjal Yojna.

petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. petitioner was a member of the Execution and Management Samiti of the Ranipur, Kurkuri Panchayat. It is next submitted that no any discrepancies have been made from the side of the petitioner rather all the fund amount was given to co-accused, namely, Geeta Devi or to the person assigned with the work. It is further submitted that around ten lakh rupees was given through NEFT to the private agency from time to time, out of that, work of about Rs. 9,36,479/- was completed but as per M. Book, after deduction, the amount comes to Rs. 8,51,259/-. The petitioner is in custody since 30.03.2025 and has got no criminal antecedent.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and taking into account the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail after framing of charge, if not already framed on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Paliganj P.S. Case No. 285 of 2022, subject to the following conditions:

(I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioner.

(II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

8. The learned Court below is directed to expedite the process of framing of Charge. (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)

Rajorshi/- U T

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top