SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 4685

PATNA HIGH COURT
S. B. PD. SINGH, J
Pramod Kumar Shaw – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.Sudish Kumar
For the Respondents: Mr.Umanath Mishra

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. B. PD. SINGH ORAL ORDER

2 18-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in a case instituted for the offence punishable under Sections 467 , 468, 420, 471, 120(B) of Indian Penal Code .

3. As per complaint, when the complainant along with his family came to his village from Vishunpur (W.B.), he came to know that petitioner has sold his land fraudulently to other accused persons.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. It is further submitted that the petitioner is the nephew of the complainant and the present case has arisen out of an existing land dispute between the parties. De-facto, the petitioner has sold 34 dismil of land out of the joint family property, in respect of which he is a lawful title holder. It is also stated in paragraph 3 of the petition that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer of bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top