Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
Sandeep Kumar, J
Ramesh Kr. Pandit @ Ramesh Pandit – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the nature of allegations with respect to caste status. (Para 3) |
| 2. arguments presented on behalf of the appellant. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's observation on the applicability of the sc/st act. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. decision to allow anticipatory bail. (Para 8) |
| 5. conditions for the bail granted. (Para 9) |
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER
3 04-12-2025 Heard the parties.
2. This appeal is preferred against the order dated
11.07.2023 passed by the Learned Additional Sessions Judge-I- cum-Special Judge SC/ST (POA) Act, Banka in A.B.P. No. 1025/2023 (arising out of Banka SC/ST P.S. Case No. 38/18) registered under Sections 147 , 341, 323, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 3(i)(r)(g) of the SC/ST (POA) Act by which the prayer of the appellant for grant of anticipatory bail has been rejected.
3. As per the prosecution case, the informant alleged that the appellant and other accused persons variously armed assaulted him and even abused him by taking his caste name.
4. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant has falsely been implicated in this case and no offence under the provisions of SC/ST Act is made out in this case as the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
