SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 4785

PATNA HIGH COURT
SANDEEP KUMAR, J
Lalan Muni – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar Patna – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Heera Jha, Mr. Vivekanand Singh
For the Respondents: Mrs. Usha Kumari

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER

4 23-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the appellants, the learned Spl. P.P. for the State and the learned counsel for the informant.

2. This appeal is preferred against the order dated

12.06.2025 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge 1st cum Special Judge, SC/ST (POA)Act, Khagaria passed in ABA No. 45 of 2024 arising out of Mahesh Khunt P.S. Case No. 54 of 2024 registered for the offence under Sections 341 , 323, 324, 325, 354B, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and under Sections 3(i)(r)(s) of the SC/ST Act , by which the prayer of the appellants for anticipatory bail was rejected.

3. As per the prosecution case, the appellants are accused of assaulting the victim and abusing by taking his caste name.

4. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the appellants have falsely been implicated in this case and no offence under the provisions of SC/ST Act is made out in this case and therefore, this anticipatory bail application is maintainable. He further submits that for a trivial dispute, the occurrence took place.

5. Learned counsel for the State and the learned counsel for the informant have opposed the prayer

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top