Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
SANDEEP KUMAR, J
Lalan Muni – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar Patna – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of the accused and allegations. (Para 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding false implication. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's observation on the absence of sc/st basis. (Para 6) |
| 4. court's ruling on maintainability of bail. (Para 7) |
| 5. summary of the court's final decision on bail. (Para 8 , 9) |
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER
4 23-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the appellants, the learned Spl. P.P. for the State and the learned counsel for the informant.
2. This appeal is preferred against the order dated
12.06.2025 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge 1st cum Special Judge, SC/ST (POA)Act, Khagaria passed in ABA No. 45 of 2024 arising out of Mahesh Khunt P.S. Case No. 54 of 2024 registered for the offence under Sections 341 , 323, 324, 325, 354B, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and under Sections 3(i)(r)(s) of the SC/ST Act , by which the prayer of the appellants for anticipatory bail was rejected.
3. As per the prosecution case, the appellants are accused of assaulting the victim and abusing by taking his caste name.
4. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the appellants have falsely been implicated in this case and no offence u
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
