SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 4834

PATNA HIGH COURT
Sanjay Kumar Singh, J
Dev Mohan Singh – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Ms. Akanksha Rai
For the Respondents: Mr. Dilip Kumar No. 1, APP

For the Petitioner/s : Ms. Akanksha Rai, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dilip Kumar No. 1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

2 05-12-2025 By means of this bail application, petitioner, who is in-

volved in connection with Gandhi Maidan P.S. case no. 39 of 2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 316(3), 318(4) of B.N.S. , seeks enlargement on bail during the pendency of trial.

2. Heard Ms. Akanksha Rai, learned counsel for the peti-

tioner and Mr. Dilip Kumar No. 1, learned APP representing the State.

3. As per prosecution case, the informant got the First In-

formation Report lodged against the petitioner alleging inter alia that petitioner has assured his son that he could get him a job in the Custom department but for this he has to pay Rs eight lakhs. His son believing his words gave a sum of Rs. 2,04,000/- to the petitioner. It is also alleged that after some days his son received a joining letter by post and thereafter petitioner further taken Rs.

5,96,000/- on the pretext of joining and sent him to Calcutta Custom department, where he came to know that said appoint-

men

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top