PATNA HIGH COURT
SATYAVRAT VERMA, J
Pankaj Sahni – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER
2 01-12-2025 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 323 , 365, 447 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code .
3. Learned APP for the State, at the outset, submits that the law is clear that where offences for which an FIR has been instituted carry punishment of seven years and less, the arrest is not automatic. It is further submitted that if the police intend to arrest an accused, who is implicated in a case relating to offences which carry punishment of seven years or less, in that event, the police have to resort to certain procedure as incorporated in the Cr.P.C., i.e., the police first have to give a notice under Section 41A of the Cr.P.C. Learned APP next submits that anticipatory bail may or may not be maintainable after the accused receives notice under Section 41A of the Cr.P.C. as it will depend on the facts and circumstances of the case because the police, even after issuance of notice under Section 41A of the Cr.P.C., cannot arrest the accused without seeking permission of the lea
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.